Sitting in his riding office in Montreal, Cotler says he didn’t like C-51, despite ultimately voting for it. The Liberals, he says, supported C-51 largely out of political considerations. “The party voted against the multilateral mission [against ISIS]. Then comes C-51. Harper’s saying, ‘I’m the guy who’s standing up to terror.’ If, after the ISIS vote, the Libs had been against C-51, then Harper would have said, ‘You can’t really trust these Liberals; they’re soft on terror, soft on crime,’ ” Cotler says. Trudeau, Cotler says, was sure the Conservatives would be open to compromise on the bill. To no one else’s surprise, they weren’t. “Justin is a decent guy. He’s not yet realized how these guys operate, maybe,” Cotler says.Which raises the question: shouldn't somebody running to be Prime Minister have at least some passing awareness of the events of the past decade in Canadian politics?
All for ourselves, and nothing for other people, seems, in every age of the world, to have been the vile maxim of the masters of mankind.
Friday, September 25, 2015
Readiness!!!
Ladies and gentlemen, the leader of the Liberal Party of Canada:
Labels:
c-51,
canada 2015,
cons,
justin trudeau,
libs,
stephen harper
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wow, could Trudeau really have been that naïve?
ReplyDeleteIf not, then his party seems to think the truth is even worse. Either way, this does not speak well for him or the Libs.
ReplyDelete