Even knowing far too well how determined the Harper Cons and their supporters are to pretend that they're being unfairly oppressed by anybody who dares to suggest they're anything less than infallible, I'd never have guessed their paranoia level to reach the point of whining that Canada's corporate banks are a bunch of pinko hippie commies with a bias against the Conservative government.
Which is to say that I stand corrected.
Those who defend power tend to screech the loudest when power is genuinely threatened.
Showing posts with label blogging tories. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blogging tories. Show all posts
Friday, February 12, 2010
On implausible complaints
Labels:
banks,
blogging tories,
cons
Monday, February 02, 2009
Governed by vandals
Shorter Steve Janke:
Of course I'd never suggest outright that donating money to opposition parties could result in your brake lines being cut. But let's just say that it may have happened before.
(Edit: fixed wording.)
Of course I'd never suggest outright that donating money to opposition parties could result in your brake lines being cut. But let's just say that it may have happened before.
(Edit: fixed wording.)
Labels:
bloggers,
blogging tories,
cons,
unfitness for office
Thursday, June 12, 2008
One of our least precious resources
Sure, any reasonable observer of yesterday's residential school apology would recognize that the driving force behind our national shame was a bigoted view that some cultures should be suppressed or outright eradicated in order to preserve what was then perceived as mainstream. But count on Blogging Tory Hunter to somehow respond to the apology by declaring that Canada ought to value its First Nations people primarily as an excuse to keep out immigrants.
Labels:
blogging tories,
first nations,
residential schools
Monday, April 23, 2007
Authoritarians in waiting
Lately there's been no lack of Lib and Green bloggers trying to vilify Jack Layton and the NDP at every turn - and reality be damned in the effort. But the Blogging Tories have offered a couple of reminders that they're still without equal when it comes to fact-free demonization.
Last weekend, the outrage du jour was that the NDP's reporting of publicly-available documents allegedly constituted "sabotage". And today, the festivities included an attempt to classify Jack Layton's work to build alliances with international leaders as "illegal", "sedition" and "treasonous" - notwithstanding the fact that other opposition politicians, including Stephen Harper in his time on opposition benches, have (quite properly) engaged in similar efforts.
Of course, such overheated rhetoric is usually a sign that a party is doing something right. And indeed the NDP deserves full credit both for holding the Cons accountable, and working to build more effective links abroad. But it's still remarkable how many Con supporters would seem entirely happy to make "existing while NDP" (or presumably any other party which was managing to successfully oppose the Cons) into a capital offence.
Last weekend, the outrage du jour was that the NDP's reporting of publicly-available documents allegedly constituted "sabotage". And today, the festivities included an attempt to classify Jack Layton's work to build alliances with international leaders as "illegal", "sedition" and "treasonous" - notwithstanding the fact that other opposition politicians, including Stephen Harper in his time on opposition benches, have (quite properly) engaged in similar efforts.
Of course, such overheated rhetoric is usually a sign that a party is doing something right. And indeed the NDP deserves full credit both for holding the Cons accountable, and working to build more effective links abroad. But it's still remarkable how many Con supporters would seem entirely happy to make "existing while NDP" (or presumably any other party which was managing to successfully oppose the Cons) into a capital offence.
Labels:
blogging tories,
ndp,
wingnuts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)