Saturday, September 28, 2019

Saturday Morning Links

This and that for your weekend reading.

- Keith Gerein writes that Alberta's petro-state can't mask the fact that climate denialism is leading to governance failing its own province's children. Murray Mandryk notes that Scott Moe and company are far more childish than the teens leading the climate justice movement. And Stephen Maher challenges the claim that it's a viable plan to leave a worsened climate breakdown - exacerbated by a push to expand fossil fuel production - for future generations to fix:

It ought to be easier for Canada to cut emissions, since we pollute so much more per person. Canada’s emissions per person are among the highest in the world at 16 tonnes. China’s are just seven. You don’t have to think about it very hard to realize that it ought to be easier for us to cut than it is for them.

And if we don’t cut emissions in both countries, soon and steeply, the world is in big trouble, worse trouble than most people realize. The ice caps will melt. The coral reefs will all die. Coastal cities will be washed away. Some of the world’s biggest cities will become uninhabitable. There will be pressure to cool the earth by forcing particulate matter into the stratosphere, a terrifying prospect, turning the Earth into a science experiment.
...

The horrible truth, the message that Thunberg will deliver in Montreal today, is that we have no choice but to pay. We can pay now or leave it for her generation to pay later, when the price will be much steeper, tragically steeper.

The problem is that we do not want to hear her message, not just because of the PR campaign telling us that we’re foolish to be alarmed—which is a lie—but because it’s easier to do nothing and let Thunberg’s generation deal with it.

It’s no wonder she is angry.
- But PressProgress notes that the Cons are eagerly promoting candidates who promotes not only climate change denial, but opposition to evolution. And Michael Fraiman points out that beyond the climate crisis itself, the Cons are also wilfully ignorant of the effects of their policies intended to address it - including through Andrew Scheer's stunning declaration that wider roads would somehow reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

- Meanwhile, Chris Selley rightly tears into the Libs' campaign promise of camping trips for people in dire need of housing and income supports.

- Finally, Avnish Nanda writes about the importance of joining together to fight anti-immigrant messages and other attempts to stoke hatred for political gain.

1 comment:

  1. She can be as angry as she likes : and so can you. None of that will change the fact that neither the government nor Man can change the climate - no matter how urgent such a proposition may seem. Even taking leave of my senses to the point of saying "what if" on the topic of 'emissions' ( that being that they are not identified as being a measurable / perceptible 'driver' of climate ), nobody has identified a cost / benefit relationship. Well, aside from being ridiculous and amounting to culling mankind by destroying energy systems worldwide at an expense ratio exceeding any conceivable tax revenue.
    I live in Alberta and 'deny' that it is possible to allocate any measure to the hypothesis man has changed climate. Whatever it might be falls within margin of error for measurement - which is currently a scandal over 'corrections' to the raw data. Justification is immaterial, Trash is trash.
    If you don't know climate would have been without man, you certainly cannot figure out what effects he has had.
    There are hints : 90 Italian scientists : CO2 impact on climate exaggerated https://notrickszone.com/2019/07/04/90-leading-italian-scientists-sign-petition-co2-impact-on-climate-unjustifiably-exaggerated-catastrophic-predictions-not-realistic/ Historical opinion has been completely thrown out. This chap founded the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia U - later the site of Climategate emails. https://enthusiasmscepticismscience.wordpress.com/h-h-lamb/
    Finnish study finds 'practically no evidence' for man made climate change https://www.rt.com/news/464051-finnish-study-no-evidence-warming/
    I have lots more. There is no shortage of people disagreement with climate alarm. They are not lethargic so much as disgusted at infantile panic.

    ReplyDelete