CTV
reports on the funnelling of money from SNC-Lavalin into the Cons' coffers. And we shouldn't be surprised to see that connection in light of the Cons'
attitude toward corporate wrongdoing.
But it's especially worth noting what's missing from the Cons' denials of involvement:
Elections Canada records reveal that 10 top SNC-Lavalin managers and
their wives wrote personal cheques in 2009 to two federal Conservative
riding associations that showed little chance of winning.
A total of $25,000 was funnelled to the ridings of Laurier-Sainte-Marie and Portneuf-Jacques-Cartier.
Approximately $30,000 was then transferred out to Megantic-L’Erable, the riding of then-public works minister Christian Paradis...
...
In a statement on Friday, the Conservative Party said: “Neither Minister
Paradis nor his riding association had any reason to believe these
donations were anything other than the lawful, individual donations they
were. It appears SNC deliberately concealed the alleged wrongdoing from
the targets of their actions, including from Minister Paradis.”
One might be able to paint the Megantic-L'Erable riding association as merely a recipient of a windfall which simply didn't turn down money being made available from within its own party. (Though there's reason for skepticism on that front too until the scheme is investigated.)
But what about the two ridings which received the donations in the first place then passed the money along - and who are left out of the Cons' list of people who didn't have reason for concern about the donations?
Are the Cons acknowledging that they don't have any basis to defend either how the money showed up on their doorstep in the first place, or how it was then directed to Paradis? Or is the Cons' claim that SNC-Lavalin took over their riding associations to the point of being able to "deliberately conceal" major donations from, and transfers within, their own party?
No comments:
Post a Comment