All for ourselves, and nothing for other people, seems, in every age of the world, to have been the vile maxim of the masters of mankind.
Thursday, December 16, 2010
The logical inference
Not that I disagree with his analysis about the Libs' generally counterproductive response to Con spin about a coalition. But if Paul Wells is correct in suggesting that the Libs should use recent history as their guide to the structural forces needed to break Canada's current political impasse, then wouldn't the 1993 example suggest their best hope is to foster the development of the Christian Heritage Party to split the Cons' vote on the right?
Labels:
cons,
libs,
michael ignatieff,
paul wells,
reform,
stephen harper
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment