New column day

Here, on how the choice of Scott Moe and other right-wing leaders to ally themselves with white supremacists and nativists (as seen most recently through yellow vest and United We Roll events) is as politically flawed as it is morally objectionable.

For further reading...
- Adam Hunter reported on Moe's initial willingness to have his cabinet members connected to yellow vest events. And Stephanie Taylor reported on his involvement in later events linked to the convoy which arrived in Ottawa this week.
- Samantha Beattie has examined the ensuing convoy in general, while Evan Balgord has focused in on David Selvers in particular. And Hamdi Issawi reported on the recognition of some involved that they were tied into unacceptable bigotry.
- As for what happened as United We Roll arrived in Ottawa, Issawi reported on the weak turnout and disproportionate number of right-wing politicians eager to be associated with a tiny and extreme group.
- Meanwhile, Zi-Ann Lum reported on Conservative Senator David Tkachuk's violent rhetoric. And Tamara Khandaker questioned Andrew Scheer's willingness to be linked to Faith Goldy among other hatemongers.
- And finally, Andy Toy looked into the funding which went to an organizer rather than to participants in the convoy.

Friday Morning Links

Content goes here.

- Susan Riley nicely sums up how quickly the Cons have adopted the worst abuses of the government they replaced:

For rampant patronage, however, it is hard to better the prime minister's moral collapse on Senate reform -- especially his tendency to provide failed candidates and party operatives a taxpayer-subsidized perch from which to conduct their partisan activities.

When Jack Layton suggested banning fundraisers and backroom boys from the Senate as a modest, doable reform, he was laughed out of town. When Liberals objected that Conservative star candidate, Larry Smith, is getting a free office, a $130,000 salary and a public profile to help with his first electoral campaign, Conservative Senate leader Marjory LeBreton's response was scathing. The Liberals did exactly the same thing, she declared. But wait -- weren't Conservatives supposed to be different?

Not so much, as it turns out. In a few short years, they have achieved much of what took their Liberal predecessors decades: shameless patronage, fraying caucus discipline, an air of entitlement and utter policy confusion (unless someone has figured out the Harper position on foreign ownership.) You wonder how long it will take the electoral cycle to catch up.

- But of course the Cons have also gone further in some cases - such as their efforts to ensure that official records bear no relationship to reality:

Liberal Sen. Jane Cordy said newsletters that serve as blatant partisan advertisements should be outlawed and said she made the point clearly during an in-camera meeting in December — but her point of view was not reflected.

“When it is blatant politics,” she said, interrupted by the chair, Tory Sen. David Tkachuk who was laughing. “When it is a blatant political advertisement in your newsletters, I have a problem with that.”

The minutes from the December meeting, however, state that “after discussion, it was agreed that senators’ newsletters, with partisan content, is acceptable.”

Cordy said she “did not agree to that.”

- And that's far from the only example.

- But then, when the record can no longer be denied, it's perpetually time to move on without fixing a thing.