The latest from the federal NDP's leadership campaign.
- Bruce Anderson and David Coletto take a look at public perceptions of Canada's political parties. And the relatively small differences in public views of the NDP as compared to the Liberals may offer either a suggestion as to what grounds of distinction appear most open at the moment, or a challenge to the leadership contenders to discuss how they plan to shift public opinion.
- The Canadian Federation of Students offers the candidates' responses on post-secondary education. Arshy Mann examines Niki Ashton's LGBTQ policy proposals. Radio-Canada interviews Guy Caron about his place in the race, including the danger of focusing unduly on fund-raising totals. And Ryan Maloney reports on David Suzuki's endorsement of Charlie Angus.
- Stephen Tweedale offers a thoughtful endorsement of Jagmeet Singh, with a particular emphasis on his income security proposals. And Matthew Green discusses how Singh persuaded him to join a political party, while Jules Sherred offers his view of what the theme of "love and courage" means.
- Meanwhile, Jenn Laura Lee supports Ashton as a transformational voice for youth. And David Heap sees her as an inspiration for members of the progressive movement to re-engage in party politics.
- Aaron Wherry discusses the implications of Singh electing not to move immediately to seek out a seat in the House of Commons if he wins. Molly Kraft comments on the significance of Singh's candidacy - and some responses to it - in determining how inclusive the NDP will be as a party. And Eric Grenier offers some projected numbers as to the candidates' first-ballot placement - and the membership totals Singh would need to bring in to rank at the top.
Those who defend power tend to screech the loudest when power is genuinely threatened.
Showing posts with label cfs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cfs. Show all posts
Saturday, August 19, 2017
Thursday, October 28, 2010
Now where have we seen this before...
Let's see. A controversial decision to fund only the right-wing side of a contentious issue with no notice beforehand or documentation afterward (at least until after a vote that will render moot any new information), coupled with promises of transparency that never come...
Can this be anything but the Cons' campus strategy at work?
Can this be anything but the Cons' campus strategy at work?
Labels:
cfs,
cons,
university of regina
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)