Thursday, February 28, 2013

New column day

Here, on how the current controversy over residency requirements only helps to show how Canada's Senate is beyond fixing.

For further reading...
- Again, Andrew Coyne similarly points out how abolition is a more viable option than trying to rewrite rules to preserve the existing Senate.
- Kelly McParland's take on Mike Duffy is probably still the best commentary linking the circumstances of the Cons' Senate scandals to the institution as a whole, while the Charlottetown Guardian rightly notes that the primary issue facing Duffy is ineligibility rather than expense claims.
- And amazingly, Stephen Harper is doubling down yet again in declaring that his talking points override the terms Canada's Constitution of as well as the Senate's own investigation.

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous9:04 AM

    Nanokeratin locks onto the hair, forming a fine, smooth
    coat of keratin. This article will explain the hair product diversion conspiracy and list ways that you can determine whether or not the beloved salon brand you saw in
    Walgreens last week was truly diverted merchandise or
    strategically placed by the powers that be.
    Both brands are popular in known hair salons and spas.

    Feel free to surf to my blog post ... hair products

    ReplyDelete