Wednesday, January 06, 2010

Burning questions

What's more shocking about Norman Spector's response to Stephen Harper's latest attempt to spin his way out of trouble: is it that a Con supporter is willing to admit this?
Some of what we saw on CBC Tuesday evening may be real. But most of it is fake. Who doubts that Conservative attack dogs are operating with Mr. Harper’s approval, even if he is not micromanaging each and every one of their low blows?
Or is it that Spector manages to leave the impression that saying Harper's public presentation bears little to no relation to reality is somehow a compliment, to the point where the other federal party leaders (per Spector) should be trying to emulate the deception?

No comments:

Post a Comment