tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11282727.post5262956318155175756..comments2024-03-09T04:13:53.858-06:00Comments on Accidental Deliberations: UnblockedUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11282727.post-4992595249111786282015-06-09T18:45:01.223-06:002015-06-09T18:45:01.223-06:00Whatever one's views on sovereignty, I'd h...Whatever one's views on sovereignty, I'd hope we can at least agree that it's a remote prospect at the moment. And the best way to ensure it never becomes an issue again is to make sure Quebeckers see their priorities being reflected in Canada's federal government.<br /><br />And I wouldn't think the NDP is the only party which could be affected by Bloc-induced vote splits. In particular the Cons have been trying to use cultural exclusion as a wedge of their own, and might be vulnerable if the Bloc can portray itself as more-pure-laine-than-thou. Greg Fingashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01506686081291502115noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11282727.post-22133488845397933202015-06-09T17:38:10.694-06:002015-06-09T17:38:10.694-06:00Duceppe could help split the francophone vote enou...Duceppe could help split the francophone vote enough to ruin chances of an NDP gov't. It could also split the vote enough to mean more Harper. I am still bothered about how the NDP does apper to suck up to the soft nationalists. As PET said, that leads to "incremental separation". Quebecers know this and that is why more anglos prefer Liberals. The Sherbrooke Declaration proves this. 50%+1 is ok to break up a country, yet it takes 2/3 votes to change anything in the party itself. Before I get attacks, I am an NDP voter. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com