tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11282727.post2503421153176053742..comments2024-03-09T04:13:53.858-06:00Comments on Accidental Deliberations: New column dayUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11282727.post-46256613937666227202014-09-19T07:17:35.174-06:002014-09-19T07:17:35.174-06:00I don't see how one can treat the statement as...I don't see how one can treat the statement as sarcasm without bending over backwards to be generous to Trudeau. There's no distinction in tone from the rest of the interview, and it flows from boilerplate anti-"extremist" rhetoric as Trudeau's seeming policy response. <br /><br />But if Trudeau wants to repudiate it, that would certainly alleviate what's looking like reason for concern that he's happy to follow in Harper's footsteps on far too many fronts.Greg Fingashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01506686081291502115noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11282727.post-53859113462804509562014-09-18T16:39:23.653-06:002014-09-18T16:39:23.653-06:00After last week's excellent column on governme...After last week's excellent column on governments letting businesses escape accountability, this column bombs by portraying Trudeau's sarcasm about shun lists as support for same. He clearly wants the Harper government to "explain why we should stay away from engaging with Canadians." Seems like a case of truth being bent to generate a falsely premised column, Greg, which is far below your usual standard of quality commentating.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com